State
of the Art Surgical Technique: Follicular Unit Hair
Grafting
By Jeffrey
S. Epstein, MD
Introduction
Text
Surgical Technique
Results
Case Examples
Comment
Conclusion
References
Author: Jeffrey S. Epstein, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Clinical Professor, University of Miami
Private Practice, Miami, FL
305.666.1774
305.666.6708 (fax)
jsemd@foundhair.com
Send all reprint requests to Dr. Epstein: 6280 Sunset
Drive, Suite 504, Miami, FL 33143
Presented at the AAFPRS International Meeting, New York,
NY, May, 2002
INTRODUCTION:
The goal in hair restoration is natural appearing results.
Improvements in the field of hair transplantation have
developed with this goal in mind. The most recent development
is the follicular unit grafting technique, which relies
upon microscopic dissection to produce grafts each containing
a follicular unit, the natural bundling of 1 to 4 hairs,
with a minimal amount of non-hair-bearing surrounding
skin. For patients desiring surgical hair restoration,
proponents of follicular unit grafting advocate the
technique's superior results. Detractors point to the
technical challenges of performing the procedure, with
the need for a staff of trained assistants for the microscopic
dissection. What is clear is that this demanding procedure
is taking the field of hair restoration the closest
to its ultimate goal- undetectability.
TEXT:
The earliest techniques of hair transplantation, as
developed half a century ago, utilized unaesthetic plug
grafts, 4 mm circles of hair-bearing scalp containing
as many as 20 hairs. (1,2) Over the latter half of the
20th century, the size of the grafts became smaller
and smaller, in an attempt to approximate the way hair
grows naturally on the scalp. Thus, the large plug graft
became the hemi-dissected semicircle graft, then onto
the quarter graft, and continued to be made smaller
and smaller.(3-6)
Unlike those that preceded it, the micro/minigrafting
technique, popularized in the early 1990s, has come
close to accomplishing the goal of undetectability.(7,8)
With this technique, currently utilized by the majority
of hair transplant surgeons, micrografts containing
1 or 2 hairs are placed along the hairline, while the
remaining areas are transplanted with minigrafts containing
3 to 5 hairs.
Over the past several years, follicular unit grafting
has emerged as the most reliable technique for natural
appearing results.(9,10) The follicular unit graft consists
of a single follicular unit, the way hair grows in the
scalp- in tiny bundles of 1 to 4, most commonly 2 and
3 hairs. First described histologically by Headington
in 1984, the follicular unit consists of these terminal
hairs, surrounded by an adventitial sheath, in which
is also contained the sebaceous gland elements and other
supporting tissue.(11) The dissection of these individual
grafts is performed under a microscope, permitting the
excision of all excess non-hair bearing tissue.(12,13)
Transplanting exclusively with these follicular unit
grafts theoretically creates the most natural appearing
hair restoration. Of course, the follicular unit is
merely the building block; a natural appearing result
is attained through proper hairline design and other
aesthetic considerations.
The dissection and subsequent placement of as many
as 3,000 follicular units is a demanding process, utilizing
a team of experienced assistants. Proponents of this
procedure feel that the extra time and expense required
is justified by the improved results and other several
significant advantages. Microscopic dissection results
in grafts that are smaller, containing a minimum of
scalp skin. These grafts can be placed into smaller
recipient sites, theoretically allowing for greater
hair density, faster healing, and less trauma to already
existing hairs in the recipient area. In addition, transplanting
grafts with a smaller "cuff" of skin minimizes
changes in pigmentation and texture of the recipient
scalp. Microscopic dissection of the donor hairs minimizes
accidental transection and subsequent demise, with studies
confirming as much as a 20% increase in hair yield.(14)
Finally, another advantage of microscopic visualization
is the ability to accurately identify and separate grafts
according to the number of hairs each one contains.
Thus, when a 1 hair graft is placed along the anterior-most
hairline, only 1 hair, not 2 or even 3 hairs, will grow.
Return Above
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Pre-operative consultation is critical for educating
the patient about the progressive nature of male pattern
baldness, and for establishing a treatment plan. The
number of grafts to be transplanted in a procedure typically
ranges from 1600 to 2200, but can go higher or lower,
depending upon the demand (amount of bald or thinning
scalp that the patient desires to be filled) and the
supply of available donor hairs. Patients are advised
that, while an acceptable density can be achieved with
just 1 procedure for the majority of patients, with
progression of hair loss it is likely that a second
procedure will be desired in the future.
Most procedures are performed under oral sedation.
Hairline design, while beyond the scope of this discussion,
is critical for achieving a natural result. With the
patient's feedback, the future hairline is marked out;
this line will serve as a template for what will be
the location of the hairline, which is not a line but
rather a broken, irregular transition zone. The administration
of local anesthetic to the donor and recipient sites
is currently facilitated by the use of The Wand®.
This computer-controlled anesthetic injection system
permits the administration of anesthetic agent at a
slow, controlled rate that is at or just below the threshold
level of sensation.
Under sterile conditions, the fusiform-shaped single
donor strip is excised from the occipital scalp in the
subcutaneous plane just deep to the follicles. The size
of the strip is determined by the number of grafts to
be transplanted. The density of hairs in the donor region
of the scalp typically ranges from 70 to 120 follicular
units per cm2, with a median of 80. Therefore, in the
typical patient, a 20 cm2 (20 cm in length by 1 cm in
width) sized donor strip would be required for a 1600
graft procedure. The donor site defect is closed primarily
with a single running 3-0 Prolene suture (Ethicon, New
Jersey).
A team of highly trained assistants dissects the grafts
from the donor strip. Using the binocular microscope,
the single strip is subdivided into thin slivers 2 to
3 follicular units wide. These individual slivers are
then further dissected into individual follicular units,
excising all surrounding non-hair bearing scalp tissue
(see Figure 1 for illustration). The grafts are kept
in chilled saline until the time of implantation, separated
by hair number. The mean number of hairs per graft is
2.2 to 2.3, with most grafts containing 2 or 3 hairs.
The making of recipient sites is probably the single
most important step in assuring a natural result. Critical
factors include proper direction of growth, varying
density of graft placement, and the irregularity of
hair placement along the hairline. The surgeon must
make the recipient sites keeping these variables in
mind, while minimizing the transection of any existing
hairs in the area. For making the recipient sites, a
variety of instruments are available; the author prefers
the Sharp Point® blades (Ellis Instruments, New
Jersey) for their sharpness and size. The 15 degree,
22.5 degree, 30 degree, and occasionally the 45 degree
Sharp Point are used for recipient sites for 1 and small
2 hair grafts, larger 2 hair grafts, 3 and small 4 hair
grafts, and 4 hair grafts, respectively.
The placement of the grafts into the recipient sites
is performed as atraumatically as possible. Jeweler's
forceps are the ideal instrument for this purpose. Attention
to details, such as using the finest single hair grafts
along the front of the hairline, and inserting each
graft such that any natural curvature of growth of its
hair(s) complements the surgically created recipient
site angle, reinforces a natural appearing result. Graft
placement is the final step in the hair transplant procedure.
A procedure typically takes 4 to 6 hours to perform,
depending upon the number of grafts transplanted. The
patient leaves the office bandage-free, and usually
returns the next day to have the hair washed. Light
exercise and careful hair washing can be resumed on
the third day, with full resumption of physical activity
permitted at one week. Typically the tiny crusts around
the grafts fall off by 7 days, and the donor site sutures
are removed at 8 to 10 days.
Like with other forms of hair grafting, the transplanted
hairs go through a telogen effluvium stage, falling
out by the 3 weeks. As soon as 8 to 10 weeks later (if
the patient applies minoxidil to the scalp post procedure),
and continuing for the next 4 months, the hairs start
to regrow, then continue to do so as hair does elsewhere
in the scalp. If desired, a subsequent procedure can
be performed as soon as 3 to 4 months later.
Return Above
RESULTS
Over the past 2 ½ years, the author has performed
495 hair transplant procedures. Follicular unit grafting
was the technique utilized in 94% of these cases. Of
these 465 cases, 417 were performed on men, 48 on women.
The indication for treatment for the great majority
of cases was pattern baldness, with all degrees of hair
loss treated. Other indications included the repair
of scarring and hairline distortion from prior facial
plastic surgery, and trichotillomania.
The number of grafts placed in a single follicular
unit grafting procedure ranged from 250 to 3,115 with
the great majority of cases receiving between 1600-1800
grafts. The transplanted density approached 30-35 follicular
units per cm2, with higher densities achievable, when
desired, in areas where 2, 3, and 4 hair grafts were
placed closer together. Determining the percentage of
transplanted hairs that grew is very difficult to assess,
because of the inability to distinguish transplanted
from original hairs. It is the impression that this
percentage increased over the first 6 months that the
follicular unit grafting procedure was performed, reflecting
the improvement in technique and accumulated experience
of the surgeon and assistants. Currently, it can be
estimated that over 90% of transplanted hairs grow.
Telogen effluvium, or the early loss of transplanted
hairs, occurred in over 90% of hairs. Regrowth of the
transplanted hairs occurred as soon as 8 weeks post-procedure.
In almost all cases where patients applied 5% minoxidil
once daily starting at 1 week post-procedure, regrowth
occurred before 3 months. Most patients who did not
reliably apply minoxidil post-procedure required 3 to
4 months before regrowth of hair.
Complications were minimal, and results were exceptionally
rewarding. The criteria of an excellent result include
both technical and artistic factors. It is the technical
factors that are affected by the specific technique
utilized, and therefore are the relevant factors to
assess. These technical factors include: absence of
recipient site skin alterations such as hypopigmentation,
dimpling, and scarring; ability to reliably place 1
hair grafts along the anterior-most hairline with 2,
3, and 4 hair grafts placed progressively behind to
create a subtle feathering zone; an overall natural,
non-grafted appearance; and absence of donor site scarring.
Based upon these criteria, excellent to outstanding
results are achieved in nearly all patients. Patients
are almost universally satisfied with the results of
their procedure.
Complications at times did occur, but nearly all could
be considered minor and usually resolved with time.
These complications included: lower percentage of hair
growth than expected in 7 patients, requiring the performance
of an additional small procedure to replace the hairs
that didn't grow; prolonged scalp erythema of longer
than 3 weeks in 1 patient; superficial cellulitis in
2 patients that required a change in antibiotic but
that resulted in normal hair growth; excessive "shock"
to the original existing hairs in 2 patients, leaving
them somewhat thinner for the first 6 to 10 weeks until
these hairs started to regrow, and in all cases resulting
in a return to full density; and 1 case of partial thickness
skin breakdown of less than 4 cm in diameter in the
anterior central forelock region after a procedure of
3115 grafts performed in an active cigarette smoker
which was subsequently treated with a scar repair and
further grafting.
Return Above
CASE EXAMPLES
Patient 1: 34 y.o. male, with Class 4 Hamilton-Norwood
hair loss. Treated with a single procedure of 2200 follicular
unit grafts.
Patient 2: 54 y.o. male, with Class 6 hair loss. Treated
with a single procedure of 2300 follicular unit grafts.
COMMENT
Follicular unit grafting is an enormously satisfying
procedure to perform, with high patient satisfaction
and very acceptable results. From a technical perspective,
the procedure requires a highly motivated team of assistants,
capable of dissecting grafts under a microscope for
prolonged periods of time. Switching from traditional
micro/minigrafting to the follicular unit grafting required
adding 3 assistants to the original 3 that had been
sufficient to perform cases without microscopic dissection.
Training of these new assistants was facilitated by
the use of the microscope because it is easier to visualize
the individual follicular units, an observation made
by others as well.(14)
With experience and the feedback provided by follow-up
of patients, refinements in technique have been made.
Extensive dissection of all surrounding non-hair bearing
skin has been reduced. By including a slightly larger
cuff of tissue around the follicles, hair growth seems
to have improved. This is likely due to the greater
protection of the follicle from damage from dessication
and trauma during the planting the graft. Dessication
appears to be the greatest enemy to graft survival,
and numerous precautions are taken to prevent it. The
most important step is storing grafts in chilled saline
from the time of donor site harvest to implantation.
To further assure good hair growth, saline rather than
hydrogen peroxide is used to clean the scalp of blood
and other debris during the procedure.
Several steps help to minimize scarring in both the
donor and recipient site regions. Donor site scarring
(width of scar greater than 3 mm) is avoided by suturing
under minimal tension with a running 3-0 Prolene placed
superficial to the follicles. Keeping the donor strip
no wider than 10 to 12 mm minimizes closure tension;
the strip can always be made longer to obtain the greatest
number of grafts. In addition, a donor site location
at or cephalad to the plane along the top of the ears
reduces the risk of wide scar formation by avoiding
the action of the occipitalis muscle on the healing
wound edges.. Hypopigmentation and scarring of the recipient
site region is avoided by minimizing the amount of skin
around the grafts, but does not prevent the maintaining
of a small cuff of subcutaneous fat to improve graft
viability, as discussed above. Dimpling of the skin
around transplanted grafts is prevented by inserting
the grafts to a depth such that its skin is sitting
just above, and not flat or below, the surface of the
surrounding skin.
The advantages of follicular unit grafting are many.
The most important is the natural appearing results
with an absence of scalp scarring. Graft yield is significantly
increased, while trauma to already existing hairs in
areas being transplanted is reduced by the smaller recipient
sites that are needed for the smaller grafts. Other
advantages of smaller grafts include the more rapid
healing, and the ability to place grafts closer together.
Another particular advantage of follicular unit grafting
is that the technique does not commit the patient to
subsequent procedures in the future, unless further
density and/or more extensive coverage is desired. The
natural but thin look achieved after just one procedure
will be adequate for a large percentage of patients.
This makes the procedure ideal for all degrees of hair
loss, from early thinning to advanced hair loss, where
only a forelock is to be transplanted.(15)
The indications for follicular unit grafting are many,
and in the author's opinion, it is the procedure of
choice for over 90% of cases. However, there are exceptions
when follicular unit grafting may not be better than,
and maybe less effective than micro/minigrafting. Individuals
with gray, white, blonde, or salt and pepper colored
hair are usually best treated with larger minigrafts
containing 2-5 hairs. In these cases, the final result
is every bit as natural in appearance, and there is
less risk of accidental transection of the hairs (which
are very difficult to visualize) during the graft dissection
process. Women are often best treated with follicular
unit grafting, but sometimes larger grafts containing
3-6 hairs are transplanted well behind the hairline
to maximally increase density. Finally, in revision
cases where large (4-10 hairs) and even very large (10-20
hairs) grafts were previously placed, individual follicular
unit grafts are usually needed only along the anterior-most
hairline, with minigrafts more effective for filling
in the areas between the large and very large grafts.
In all of the above examples, the microscope is still
used for graft dissection, helping to minimize hair
transaction and assuring the highest yield of hair growth.
Practicing in Miami, large minorities of the patients
for hair transplantation are of Hispanic or Mediterranean
origin. Like Asians, these ethnic groups tend to have
darker hairs, and the diameter of these hairs tends
to be higher, making it more challenging to obtain a
natural appearing result. These individuals with darker,
thicker hairs probably benefit the most from follicular
unit grafting.
As with any plastic surgery procedure, the minimizing
of complications and/or less than excellent results
is essential. With growing experience, the author now
avoids performing cases of greater than 2400 to 2500
grafts, because of the small but real risk of poor hair
growth and/or compromised healing. Working as a team
with a combined experience of over 40 years of hair
transplantation, consistently excellent results are
now attainable.
Return Above
CONCLUSIONS
The author's initial 2 ½ year experience with
follicular unit grafting has proven the technique to
be worth the additional labor, effort, and expense needed
to perform it properly. For the great majority of individuals
looking for the most natural appearing results, follicular
unit grafting is the procedure of choice.
REFERENCES
---------------------------
1. Okudas S. The study of clinical experiments of hair
transplantation. Jpn J Dermatol Urol 46:135-138, 1939.
2. Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected
dermatologic conditions. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 83:463-479,
1959.
3. Pouteaux P. The use of small punches in hair-transplant
surgery. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 6:1020-1021, 1980.
4. Nordstrom REA. Micrografts for improvement of the
frontal hairline after hair transplantation. Aesthetic
Plast. Surg. 5:97-101, 1981.
5. Bradshaw W. Quartergrafts: A Technique for Minigrafts.
In: W.P. Unger, R.E.A. Nordstromm (Eds) Hair Transplantation,
2nd Edition. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988.
6. Brandy DA. Conventional grafting combined with minigrafting:
a new approach. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 13:60-63,
1987.
7. Stough DB, Nelson BR, Stough DB. Incisional slit
grafting. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 17:53-60, 1991.
8. Uebel CO. Micrografts and minigrafts: a new approach
for baldness surgery. Ann. Plast. Surg. 27:476-487,
1991.
9. Swerdloff J, Kabaker S. The state of the art: donor
site harvest, graft yield estimation, and recipient
site preparation for follicular-unit hair transplantation.
Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 1:49-52, 1999.
10. Bernstein RM, Rassman WR. The aesthetics of follicular
transplantation. Dermatol. Surg. 23:785-799, 1997.
11. Headington JT. Transverse microscopic anatomy of
the human scalp: a basis for a morphometric approach
to disorders of the hair follicle. Arch. Dermatol. 120:449-456,
1984.
12. Bernstein RM, Rassman WR, Seager D, et al. Standardizing
the classification and description of follicular unit
transplantation and mini-micrografting techniques. Dermatol.
Surg. 24:957-963, 1998.
13. Limmer BL. Elliptical donor stereoscopically assisted
micrografting as an approach to further refinement in
hair transplantation. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 20:789-793,
1994.
14. Bernstein RM, Rassman WR. Dissecting microscope
versus magnifying loupes with transillumination in the
preparation of follicular unit grafts. Dermatol. Surg.
24:875-880, 1998.
15. Epstein JE. Hair transplantation for men with advanced
degrees of hair loss. Plast. Recon. Surg. In press.
Return Above
|