What
is Follicular Unit Transplantation
By Robert
M. Bernstein, MD & William
Rassman, MD
What are Follicular Units?
Human hair grows in tiny bundles called follicular units.
Although this fact had been recognized for some time
by histologists (doctors who study human tissue), the
existence of follicular units has been largely ignored
by physicians performing hair restoration surgery.
The follicular unit of the adult human scalp consists
of 1-4 terminal (full thickness) hair follicles. In
areas of the scalp affected by genetic balding, the
healthy terminal hairs are gradually replaced by hairs
of smaller diameter and length called "miniaturized"
hairs.
In addition to the full terminal hairs, the follicular
unit contains 1-2 fine vellus hairs, sebaceous (oil)
glands, a small muscle, tiny nerves and blood vessels,
and a fine band of collagen that surrounds the unit
(the perifolliculum). The follicular unit is thus the
hair bearing structure of the skin and should be kept
intact to insure maximum growth.
The follicular unit is seen on the surface of the scalp
as a tiny group of hairs that appear to be growing together.
They are best viewed under a microscope where they are
seen as well-formed structures in the skin.
What is Follicular Unit Transplantation?
Follicular Unit Transplantation is a technique, pioneered
by the physicians at the New Hair Institute, in which
hair is transplanted from the permanent zone in the
back of the scalp into areas affected by genetic balding
(and some other types of hair loss), using only the
naturally occurring, individual follicular units. In
order to remove follicular units from the back of the
scalp without damaging them, the donor tissue must be
removed in one piece. This technique, "single strip
harvesting," is an essential component of follicular
unit transplantation as it not only preserves the follicular
units, but also prevents damage (transection) to the
individual hair follicles. It differs dramatically from
the minigrafting and micrografting technique of using
a multi-bladed knife that breaks up follicular units
and causes unacceptable levels of transection of hair
follicles.
Another essential component of Follicular Unit Transplantation
is "stereomicroscopic dissection." In this
technique all of the follicular units are removed from
the donor tissue under total microscopic control to
avoid damage. Complete stereomicroscopic dissection
has been shown to produce an increased yield (as much
as 30%) of both the absolute number of follicular units,
as well as the total amount of hair. (This procedure
differs from minigrafting and micrografting in which
grafts are cut using minimal or no magnification.)
A major advantage of follicular unit transplantation
(besides preserving follicular units and maximizing
growth) is that it allows the surgeon to use small recipient
sites. Grafts
comprised of individual follicular units are small because
follicular units are small, and because the surrounding
non-hair bearing tissue is removed under the microscope
is not trans-
planted. Follicular unit grafts can be inserted into
tiny needle-
sized sites in the recipient area, that heal in just
a few days, without leaving any marks.
When performed by a skilled surgical team, Follicular
Unit Transplantation can produce totally natural-looking
hair transplants that maximize the yield from the patient's
donor supply to give the best possible cosmetic results.
Because the tiny follicular unit grafts (and the very
small wounds they are placed in) allow large number
of grafts to be safely transplanted in one procedure,
the total restoration can be completed in the fewest
possible sessions.
The reason for using only Follicular Units
The fact that scalp hair grows in follicular units,
rather than individually, is most easily observed by
densitometry, a
simple technique whereby scalp hair is clipped short
in a very
small area and then observed via magnification in a
10mm2 field. What is very obvious when one examines
the scalp by this method, is that follicular units are
relatively compact, but
are surrounded by substantial amounts of non-hair bearing
skin. The actual proportion of non-hair bearing skin
is probably on the order of 50%, so that its inclusion
in the dissection (or, conversely, its removal) will
have a substantial effect upon the outcome of the surgery.
When multiple follicular units are used (as in minigrafting
and micrografting) the additional skin that is included
will adversely affect the outcome of the surgery, by
necessitating larger wounds, making the healing slower
and often causing irregularities of the skin surface.
A great advantage of using individual follicular units
is that the wound size can be kept to a minimum, while
at the same time maximizing the amount of hair that
can be placed into it. Having the flexibility to place
up to 4 hairs in a tiny recipient site has important
implications for the design and overall cosmetic impact
of the surgery. This is one major advantage that follicular
unit transplantation has over extensive micrografting.
Follicular Unit Transplantation can minimize or eliminate
the "see through" look that is so characteristic
of micrografting.
The main reason for transplanting only individual follicular
units is to duplicate the way hair naturally grows.
By mimicking the way hair grows in nature, the doctor
can insure that the transplant will look totally natural.
Any grouping larger than the naturally occurring follicular
unit will run the risk of a pluggy, tufted look.
The Importance of Keeping Recipient Sites Small
Using only follicular units enables the recipient sites
to be kept very small. In fact, in Follicular Unit Transplantation,
the sites are so small that they are made with specialized
instruments that are the size of 18-20 gauge needles.
This is about the size that is used in routine blood
tests.
The importance of minimizing the wound size in any
surgical procedure cannot be over emphasized. This,
of course, includes hair transplantation as well. The
effects of recipient wounding impact many aspects of
the surgery. Larger wounds tend to injure larger blood
vessels and although the blood supply of the scalp is
extensive, the damage to these vessels can have a deleterious
impact on blood flow to the tissues.
Especially when transplanting large numbers of grafts
per session, it is important to keep the recipient wounds
as small as possible so that growth will be maximized.
The compact follicular unit is the ideal way to permit
the use of the smallest possible recipient site, and
has made the transplantation of large numbers of grafts
technically feasible. Another important advantage of
the small wound is a factor that can be referred to
as the "snug fit." A follicular unit graft
is so small that it can always fit into a tiny wound
without having to remove tissue. Unlike the punch, which
destroys recipient collagen and elastic tissue, a small
incision, made with a needle, retains the basic elasticity
(recoil) of the recipient site. When a properly fitted
graft is inserted, the recipient site will then hold
it snugly in place. This "snug fit" has several
advantages. During surgery, it minimizes popping and
the need for the sometimes traumatic re-insertion or
re-positioning of grafts. After the procedure, it ensures
maximum contact of the graft with the surrounding tissue,
so that oxygenation can be quickly re-established. In
addition, by eliminating empty space around the graft,
microscopic clots are minimized and wound healing is
facilitated.
It is important to note that when trying to place larger
grafts (either round or linear), into a small site (kept
small to minimize tissue injury) compression of the
grafts is an undesirable consequence, and may result
in a tufted appearance. In contrast, when transplanting
follicular units, there are no adverse cosmetic effects
of compression, since follicular units are already tightly
compacted structures.
Finally, large wounds cause a host of other cosmetic
problems including dimpling, pigmentary alteration,
depression or elevation of the grafts, or a thinned,
atrophic look. The key to a natural appearing hair transplant
is to have the hair emerge from perfectly normal skin.
The only way to ensure this is to keep the recipient
wounds small.
How is Follicular Unit Transplantation Different
from
Mini-Micrografting?
This is one of the most commonly asked questions and
it is a very important one for those deciding which
hair restoration procedure to choose. In contrast to
Follicular Unit Transplantation, where the graft sizes
are determined by nature, in mini-micrografting (the
combination of minigrafts and micrografts as defined
in Chapter 6) the graft sizes are arbitrarily determined
by the doctor who cuts the donor tissue into the size
pieces that he wants. Another name for this technique
is mini-micrografts "cut to size."
In mini-micrografting, neither preserving follicular
units, nor even keeping hair follicles intact, are felt
to be that important. Rather, the speed and economics
of the procedure are the deciding factors. Mini-micrografters
use a multi-bladed knife to quickly generate thin strips
of tissue and then use direct visualization (rather
than microscopic control) to cut the tissue. The resulting
grafts are generally larger than follicular units and
since the excess skin is not trimmed away the donor
sites (wounds) are also larger.
It should be apparent from the comparison shown on
the next page that Follicular Unit Transplantation is
superior in producing a natural, undetectable result,
in maximizing healing, and preserving precious donor
hair. Mini-micrografting, however, requires a smaller
staff and each procedure is cheaper and shorter (although
in the end it takes more procedures and therefore may
cost just as much for this technique).
For more detailed information on NHI's Follicular Unit
Transplantation, please see the reference section in
the back of the book. Many of the original articles
can be found on our web site www.newhair.com in the
section, NHI Medical Publications
The following table summarizes the major differences
between Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) and Mini-Micrografting
THE
GRAFTS |
FUT |
Mini-Micrografting |
Follicular
Units used exclusively |
Yes
|
No |
Graft
size |
Uniformly
small |
Larger |
Number
of hairs per graft |
1-4 |
1-6 (or more) |
Hair/skin
ratio in graft |
High |
Average |
Extra
skin transplanted |
No
|
Yes
|
Wound
size |
Uniformly
small |
Variable |
|
|
|
THE
TECHNIQUE |
|
|
Harvesting
type |
Single-Strip
|
Multi-bladed knife |
Microscopes
required |
Yes
|
No |
Follicular
Units Preserved |
Yes |
No |
Follicular
transection |
No |
Yes |
Maximizes
donor supply |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
THE
RESULTS |
|
|
Healing
time |
Fast |
Slower |
Skin
surface change |
No |
Yes |
Maximum
fullness |
Yes |
No |
Undetectable
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
COST
& CONVENIENCE |
|
|
Staff
requirements |
Moderate |
Small |
Duration
of individual procedure |
Long |
Short |
Time
for complete restoration |
Short |
Long |
Cost
per procedure |
More |
Less |
Total
cost for restoration |
Similar |
Similar |
|